Brother
May Allah reward you for the good intentions you have and for the effort you are making for deen. Please note the following points relating to the fake hadiths you mentioned.
First:
Weak (daeef) is very different from Fabricated (Mawdoo’). There is Ijma’ that weak hadiths are accepted as long as they are not used for Aqeedah and Halaal/Haraam. So be sure to make the difference between fake and weak.
Second:
Before declaring things the way you do, with so much authority, you need to have a profusion of knowledge on hadith, both riwaaratan and diraayatan. With all due respect to your personality and the work you are doing, I believe you have but very little (I might have less). So please leave this to the specialists.
Third:
And by specialists, I do not mean people like Albani. He is not a muhaddith. He stands against too many of the salafs. When you speak of authorities of hadiths, then your words are acceptable. Albani and the like are very far from being authorities in hadith.
May Allah guide us all.
May Allah forgive you brother Abusanaa for the falsehood which you have presented, whether it was intentional or out of ignorance.
1) The Ijma’ which you claimed that weak hadiths are accepted as long as they are not in Aqeedah or Ahkaam, then that is not true! Please provide proof for your claim, for no such consensus exists!
2) Sheikh Al-Albani may Allah have mercy on him have proven himself as the hadith scholar of recent times whether you like it or not. Your claim that many salafis are against him is not true either! Even those who do not like the Sheikh such as the people of innovation and those who belong to deviant sects such as sufis and ash’aris have admitted that the Sheikh is an authority when it comes to hadith. I would suggest you fear Allah and not spread falsehood about the great scholars who have serviced this deen. What have you done that equates to even one-tenth of what this great scholar has done for the hadith of the Prophet peace and blessings be upon him?!
May Allah guide you my brother.
I am not sure why the validity of this hadith is in question, as it clearly does not contradict Quran. Please expalin…
Sister Jana, to determine whether a hadith is authentic or not the scholars go through its chain of narration to see whether the Prophet peace be upon him did in fact say it. It is not whether the hadith “contradicts” the Quran or not how you would determine the authenticity of a hadith.
Salaam Alaikum WR WB,
If you’re going to claim that a hadith is weak or fake you MUST provide more information. Reasons for it being fake: Weak narration, if so, how? A break in the chain? A corrupt narrator? One transmitter? Contradict an authentic Hadith? Does it violate the Qur’an?
WS
I dont understand, does it mean that this publication is fake? More light please.
October 26, 2010 at 8:27 am
Dear Bro,
Masha Allah you have done very nice efforts in other areas. I have been spreading your research work. Please continue with your good work. But, be careful when it comes to some issue related with Islamic knowledge.
I clicked on the Fake hadith tab but you are also quoting the weak hadeeths under the same caption. See this is my personal advice leave this matter with scholars of Hadeeth. There are several books on Mowdhoo Ahadeeth for reference contact the Ops on this site http://www.albalagh.net
Regards,
Rehan ahmed